Combined Use of Antimicrobial Peptides with Antiseptics against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Pros and Cons.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are acknowledged as a promising template for designing new antimicrobials. At the same time, existing toxicity issues and limitations in their pharmacokinetics make topical application one of the less complicated routes to put AMPs-based therapeutics into actual medical practice. Antiseptics are one of the common components for topical treatment potent against antibiotic-resistant pathogens but often with toxicity limitations of their own. Thus, the interaction of AMPs and antiseptics is an interesting topic that is also less explored than combined action of AMPs and antibiotics. Herein, we analyzed antibacterial, antibiofilm, and cytotoxic activity of combinations of both membranolytic and non-membranolytic AMPs with a number of antiseptic agents. Fractional concentration indices were used as a measure of possible effective concentration reduction achievable due to combined application. Cases of both synergistic and antagonistic interaction with certain antiseptics and surfactants were identified, and trends in the occurrence of these types of interaction were discussed. The data may be of use for AMP-based drug development and suggest that the topic requires further attention for successfully integrating AMPs-based products in the context of complex treatment. AMP/antiseptic combinations show promise for creating topical formulations with improved activity, lowered toxicity, and, presumably, decreased chances of inducing bacterial resistance. However, careful assessment is required to avoid AMP neutralization by certain antiseptic classes in either complex drug design or AMP application alongside other therapeutics/care products.

Incidence of Common Herpesviruses in Colonic Mucosal Biopsies Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Intestinal complications are common after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, only scarce data concern herpesvirus incidence in the colonic mucosa post-HSCT. Our purpose was to assess the frequency and clinical significance of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein−Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV6), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) in the colonic mucosa post-HSCT. The study group included 119 patients of different ages, mostly with leukemias and lymphomas, subjected to allo-HSCT from haploidentical related (48%) or HLA-compatible donors (52%). In total, 155 forceps biopsies of the colonic mucosa were taken in cases of severe therapy-resistant intestinal syndrome post-HSCT. Most samples were taken from the descending, sigmoid, and transverse colon. Intestinal GVHD or local infections were assessed clinically and by histology. EBV, CMV, HSV, and HHV6 were tested in colonic mucosal lysates with commercial PCR assays. HSV was found in <8% of colonic samples, along with high HHV6 and CMV positivity (up to 62% and 35%, respectively) and a higher EBV incidence at 5−6 months post-HSCT (35%). For CMV and EBV, significant correlations were revealed between their rates of detection in blood and colonic mucosa (r = 0.489 and r = 0.583; p < 0.05). No significant relationships were found between the presence of herpesviruses and most patients' characteristics. EBV positivity in colonic samples was correlated with delayed leukocyte and platelet recovery post-HSCT. Higher EBV frequency in the colonic mucosa was found in deceased patients (56% versus 21%, p = 0.02). The correlations among EBV positivity in the colon, lethality rates and delayed hematopoietic reconstitution suggest some relationship with systemic and local EBV reactivation post-transplant.